I need to take some time to breathe and break the confines of structure and preconceived ideas. Sometimes it can be valuable and therapeutic to an artist to release from all of the rules, and simply enjoy the journey of creating; as well as the overall actions of rudimentary skills being applied. This has led me to dive back into my love/hate relationship with Jackson Pollock. As long as I can remember have had issues with the Post-Impressionism and some Contemporary movements for their almost snobbish lack of definition, detail, and purpose.
There are many schools of thought and infinitely many more numbers of subject matter and mediums in the art world. That being said what defines "art"? For me personally, art is a means of communication, a universal language that transcends spoken bounds allowing for a learning and dialogue between the artist, viewers, and their internal selves. I had trouble identifying with the likes of Andy Warhol, Pollock, Yoko Ono, and many others in this movement due to their lack of respect for this responsibility to use art with a purpose. In more recent years it has become a self revelation that art doesn't always have to be shared with others, doesn't always have to have a purpose, and doesn't always have to mean something.
Why have I been able to finally been able to get on board with this side of the art world? It has a lot to do with my own self exploration and the feelings I have been working through. I am able to see that artist like Pollock were using their non-descriptive, loose, abstract, expressionist, no-holds-barred process of creating art, to allow them a vehicle for working though their internal thoughts, ideas, and struggles. Almost like a catharsis or purging there is no real reason or meaning but the feeling that the "art" has to come out. For the artist it could mean everything, and nothing, be private, or shared.
Likewise for the viewer the reaction to a nondescript piece could fall the same way. This is also similar to the create and destroy art process or even the creation of crafts. In the end the real "art" lies in all the parts not just the end result. It can be the methodical nature in which materials are selected and prepped. Then move into getting ones feet wet like a curious child. To following the directions to the end goal, and/or to the destruction of the piece as a lesson of the temporary nature of things. I was even considering how from a therapy and meditation standpoint one may quilt, knit, wood carve, or create something with specific structure and instructions. Not unlike how a Buddhist would work on a zen garden or colored sand art mural, or how a political demonstrator may have a person cut strips of their clothing or leave comments in a box. Even how pollock splattered paint just to release, move forward, process, discover ect...
I have a new respect for this dialogue the artist has with him/herself, their materials, and the journey with all the power it can have to let us come to new understandings as we work through tough things. I took some time to create a "digital pollock" today and I called it "Brightly cH@0tic & Melodic", because I kept hearing a rhythm in my mind as it was created. When I slowed down and sped up and stayed loose, I was appreciating just the visuals as the color and lines took form for me. Hope you like!!!


















